<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The English Eye &#187; abstract</title>
	<atom:link href="http://79.170.44.136/theenglisheye.com/category/abstract/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://79.170.44.136/theenglisheye.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 12:44:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>I LIKE IT, BUT IS IT ART?</title>
		<link>http://79.170.44.136/theenglisheye.com/i-like-it-but-is-it-art/</link>
		<comments>http://79.170.44.136/theenglisheye.com/i-like-it-but-is-it-art/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abstract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black and white]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bourton-on-the-Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gloucestershire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long Barrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mono]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.44.136/theenglisheye.com/i-like-it-but-is-it-art/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since the earliest days of photography, this question has been raised from time to time: &#8220;But is it art?&#8221; So to think on the subject, here are three versions of the same image, taken recently at the ancient Long Barrow neolithic site, near the &#8216;English Venice&#8217; village of Bourton-on-the-Water, in Gloucestershire. &#8220;Art is what [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-1KXXGRWMx98/UPPGgNH-LhI/AAAAAAAANpU/IVTOFTH_4zw/s1600/Long+Barrow+gaa+invert.jpg" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" height="478" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-1KXXGRWMx98/UPPGgNH-LhI/AAAAAAAANpU/IVTOFTH_4zw/s640/Long+Barrow+gaa+invert.jpg" width="640"></a></div>
<p>Ever since the earliest days of photography, this question has been raised from time to time: &#8220;But is it art?&#8221; So to think on the subject, here are three versions of the same image, taken recently at the ancient Long Barrow neolithic site, near the &#8216;English Venice&#8217; village of Bourton-on-the-Water, in Gloucestershire.</p>
<p>&#8220;Art is what you make of it&#8221; is the obvious riposte to that question, so with these images, the answer &#8211; and preference &#8211; is probably best made by the individual in all of us.</p>
<p>From this point the thought process can be fairly straightforward, allowing for the fact that surroundings make so much difference to how, where and why an image like this &#8211; or any other &#8211; is going to be used.</p>
<p>For example, the ghostly semi-abstract (top) would perhaps look best on the wall of a modern apartment, while being a little less suitable for a fireside-snug traditional environment.</p>
<div><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xFrulPDZk1A/UPPGf_oM1jI/AAAAAAAANpQ/bIwDp2qxEX4/s1600/Long+Barrow+gaa.jpg" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" height="478" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xFrulPDZk1A/UPPGf_oM1jI/AAAAAAAANpQ/bIwDp2qxEX4/s640/Long+Barrow+gaa.jpg" width="640"></a></div>
<p>Conversely the colour image &#8211; which has already had some of the brightness of its colour range reduced a little to avoid garishness &#8211; would look highly suitable hung in that traditional backdrop.</p>
<p>The black-and-white mono image combines old and new. Filters allow the clouds to look their best, while the simpler appearance of mono provides a calm, quiet flavour, and simply looks so good, wherever it goes.</p>
<div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-9upqUNecEBY/UPPGe0lUYlI/AAAAAAAANpI/1MM6Bnr9BSE/s1600/Long+Barrow+gaaa.jpg" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" height="478" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-9upqUNecEBY/UPPGe0lUYlI/AAAAAAAANpI/1MM6Bnr9BSE/s640/Long+Barrow+gaaa.jpg" width="640"></a></div>
<p>So am I a mono man? Not to the exclusion of alternatives &#8211; like I say, we&#8217;re all individuals and every image is an individual, too!</p>
<p>As for the rest of this isolated Long Barrow site &#8211; the barrow is actually the hump in the middle of the trees, dug originally as a burial mound &#8211; I&#8217;ll be presenting a short photo-essay on it soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://79.170.44.136/theenglisheye.com/i-like-it-but-is-it-art/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
